We The Free News
NRA Sues Illinois Over 72-Hour Waiting Period — Background Check Is Not Enough
legislation

NRA Sues Illinois Over 72-Hour Waiting Period — Background Check Is Not Enough

Pearlstein v. Raoul challenges a felony transfer ban that forces buyers to wait three days after they have already cleared NICS.

WTF News July 10, 2026 📖 3 min read
⚡ Why This Matters to You
NRA and Illinois retailers sued to strike the state's 72-hour post-agreement waiting period, arguing Bruen forbids a cooling-off delay after buyers already pass background checks.
  • Pearlstein v. Raoul filed in federal court July 8, 2026.
  • 720 ILCS 5/24-3(A)(g) imposes a 72-hour transfer delay unrelated to NICS timing.
  • No exceptions for CPL holders, prior owners, or imminent threats.
  • Separate from PICA assault-weapon litigation and the Seventh Circuit ruling.
  • Plaintiffs include ISRA, three FFLs, and five NRA members.

The National Rifle Association filed suit Wednesday challenging Illinois's 72-hour waiting period for firearm purchases — a mandatory "cooling-off" window that has nothing to do with how long a background check takes.

Under 720 ILCS 5/24-3(A)(g), transferring a firearm in a sale without waiting at least 72 hours after buyer and seller agree is a felony. The clock runs even when NICS clears instantly. It runs even when the buyer already owns guns, holds a concealed carry license, or faces a documented threat.

NRA-ILA filed Pearlstein v. Raoul alongside the Illinois State Rifle Association, three Illinois retailers — Sacky's Firearms, Shooting Sports, and Voodoo Firearms — and five member plaintiffs, with Mountain States Legal Foundation and the National Shooting Sports Foundation as partners.

Executive director John Commerford's statement cuts to the Bruen point: "law-abiding citizens who have already passed background checks" should not be blocked from exercising their rights because Chicago politicians want a cooling-off narrative.

The complaint argues there is no historical tradition supporting a 72-hour delay detached from qualification checks — the test Bruen requires. That is a different fight from the Seventh Circuit's PICA ruling the same week. Waiting periods are incrementalism dressed as safety: they do not stop criminals, they inconvenience everyone else.

Illinois has spent years blaming gun owners for failed urban policy while stacking transfer restrictions, dealer rules, and rifle bans. This lawsuit targets one of the oldest insults in the stack — the idea that you might murder someone with a gun you just bought legally unless the state makes you sleep on it for three days.

Watch Pearlstein v. Raoul in the Northern District of Illinois. Support the retailers named in the case — they are taking legal risk to keep the market open for lawful buyers.

"Illinois does not make you wait 72 hours to prove you are qualified. It makes you wait because it does not trust you after you are."
Illinoiswaiting periodNRAPearlstein v. Raoul720 ILCSBruenretailers
← More Stories

Comments

Share your take. Name is public; state is optional. Be civil — spam is removed.

Loading comments…