We The Free News Your Daily Gun News
We The Free News
SCOTUS Had 18 Gun Rights Cases—Took Zero
editorial

SCOTUS Had 18 Gun Rights Cases—Took Zero

The Court even granted a three-part petition—then surgically removed both 2A questions and kept the one that had nothing to do with guns.

WTF News May 24, 2026 📖 2 min read

Not one grant. Not one remand. Not one signal.

Eighteen chances to clean up the constitutional wreckage piling up in the lower courts. Eighteen times, silence.

But the Court's most surgical dodge was something else entirely. One petition arrived carrying three questions—two of them squarely about the Second Amendment. The justices granted cert on that petition. Then they cherry-picked the single non-gun question and left both 2A issues sitting on the floor like they weren't there.

**That is not an oversight. That is a decision.**

Here's the timeline that should make your blood pressure spike: Bruen (2022) rewrote the entire framework—text and history, no more interest-balancing games. Then Rahimi (2024) came along and muddied the water just enough for lower courts to wriggle. And since then? The Court has run a slow-motion avoidance operation on every hard question Bruen left open.

Circuit courts aren't just misreading Bruen at this point. Some are flat-out ignoring it—treating a landmark Supreme Court ruling like a polite suggestion from a colleague they don't respect. The justices know this is happening. The cert petitions prove it. The circuit splits are documented. The abuse of the text-and-history standard is not subtle.

And still: zero grants.

Every month SCOTUS stalls is another month anti-gun prosecutors and activist judges own the vacuum. They are writing the rules the Supreme Court refuses to write—and they are not writing them in your favor. The scoreboard right now reads: lower courts 18, gun owners 0.

**The longer this goes, the harder the climb back.**

Watch the next conference closely. If the Court punts again on the surviving petitions, the message will be impossible to ignore: the justices who gave you Bruen may not have the stomach to defend it. When that happens, demand your senators ask every future judicial nominee exactly one question—Do you apply Bruen as written, yes or no?—and accept nothing that sounds like a law-school dodge.

This story isn't over. It's getting worse. And WTF News will be at every conference until the Court is forced to answer.

Supreme CourtSecond Amendmentcert petitionjudicial actiongun rights
← More Stories

Comments

Share your take. Name is public; state is optional. Be civil — spam is removed.

Loading comments…