New Hampshire Preemption Is Worth the AG Fight — Read HB 609 Before Formella Kills It
Attorney General John Formella says he supports gun rights. His June 4 letter says vote down the strongest preemption package Republicans negotiated.
Read the conference committee text before you read the attorney general's cover letter.
House Bill 609 would make the New Hampshire Legislature the exclusive regulator of firearms and ammunition — not Manchester, not Nashua, not a university police department with a creative rulebook. Violators face declaratory-judgment suits and minimum damages starting at $1,000. That is not symbolic politics. That is enforcement against local bureaucrats who treat gun owners like a zoning problem.
Attorney General John Formella told lawmakers Wednesday the bill creates "unintended consequences" — including a 2029 sunset that could force a rush of rulemaking. Maybe. But the same letter arrives after Rep. Erica Layon called the package the most pro-Second Amendment action since constitutional carry. Formella's timing is not neutral. It is pressure on Republicans to blink before Kelly Ayotte's desk.
Gun owners in free states forget how much damage a city council can do: storage mandates, discharge bans that kill ranges, purchase delays dressed as "safety." Preemption is the structural fix when you cannot attend every municipal meeting.
And yet. Preemption does not replace training, reciprocity planning, or federal fights. It stops the patchwork that turns a 20-minute drive into a felony tour.
Call your NH representative before the roll call. Ask on the record: did you vote for Formella's warning or for Layon's bill?
Sign up for the WTF News daily brief at wtfnews.tv — preemption fights are moving in Concord while Washington performs.
"Preemption with damages is how you make local gun-grabbers pay for trying anyway."← More Stories
Comments
Share your take. Name is public; state is optional. Be civil — spam is removed.
Loading comments…