Indiana Supreme Court Kills Gary's 27-Year Gun Lawsuit

The Indiana Supreme Court killed Gary's long-running lawsuit against firearm manufacturers — a case that began in 1999 and became the blueprint for the municipal sue-them-into-submission strategy gun-control activists have pushed ever since.

Gary's legal theory was simple and cynical: hold gun makers legally responsible for crimes committed by third parties who illegally obtained firearms. In plain English — punish the manufacturer because a criminal pulled the trigger.

This is exactly the threat Congress recognized when it passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) in 2005. PLCAA exists for one reason: to stop activist cities and their trial-lawyer allies from weaponizing the court system to destroy an industry that makes products protected by the Second Amendment.

Gary held on for two decades after PLCAA passed, hunting for loopholes. The Indiana Supreme Court just closed the last one.

Make no mistake — this lawsuit was never about reducing criminal violence. It was about forcing gun manufacturers to burn millions in legal fees, extracting settlement money to fund anti-gun city budgets, and setting precedents plaintiff lawyers could copy nationwide.

That playbook is still running in other jurisdictions. Cities like Chicago and states like New Jersey continue filing similar suits, banking on sympathetic judges and juries to accomplish what legislators cannot. Every dismissal like Indiana's matters — and sets the table for the next fight.

The gun industry survived this one. The attacks won't stop.

**Bottom line:** The Indiana Supreme Court handed law-abiding gun owners and manufacturers a clean win. Know your PLCAA rights, know which politicians in your city or state are pushing this same litigation strategy, and vote them out before they waste another 27 years of taxpayer money chasing a constitutional industry into the ground.