Green Beret Congressman: SOF Vets Shouldn't Need a Permission Slip
Rep. Pat Harrigan's new bill would give Delta, SEALs, and Green Berets the same nationwide carry rights LEOSA hands to cops—and the gap is indefensible.
Rep. Pat Harrigan (NC-10) introduced the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act this week, extending federal concealed carry authority to both active-duty and veteran special operations personnel. Delta operators. SEAL Teams. Green Berets. Raiders. The people who spent careers mastering weapons systems, close-quarters combat, and threat assessment at the highest levels on the planet.
Right now, every single one of them comes home and hits a bureaucratic wall.
Under current law, a retired beat cop with a department-qualifying score gets nationwide carry authority under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA). A retired Tier 1 operator who spent two decades in direct-action raids does not. He patches together state permits like the rest of us—or goes unarmed. **Let that sink in.**
Harrigan's bill fixes exactly that. It mirrors the LEOSA framework and extends the same federal carry authority to SOF personnel whose firearms training and marksmanship standards exceed virtually every law enforcement qualification in the country. The logic is airtight. The politics should be easy. The only question is whether Congress actually has the spine.
Harrigan isn't theorizing from a think tank. He served in special operations before winning his congressional seat. He has stood in those training lanes. He knows what a Tier 1 qualification course looks like—and he knows exactly how insulting it is to tell a man who trained that hard that he needs a permission slip to protect his family in North Carolina.
**This is the gap nobody in Washington wants to admit exists—because admitting it means explaining why they never closed it.**
The bill deserves loud, immediate, bipartisan co-sponsorship. Whether it gets that—or quietly suffocates in committee while the same Congress hunts for new ways to restrict law-abiding gun owners—will tell you everything about who actually respects military service versus who just pins a little flag on their lapel and calls it a day.
Watch the co-sponsor list. Watch who goes silent. The names on that bill, and the names conspicuously absent, will be a scorecard worth saving.
**The bottom line:** These warriors earned the right to carry everywhere they go. Call your representative. Demand a co-sponsorship. Make it law—before another veteran has to explain to a bureaucrat why he's qualified to be trusted with a firearm.
Comments
Share your take. Name is public; state is optional. Be civil — spam is removed.
Loading comments…