We The Free News Your Daily Gun News
We The Free News
Delaware’s Highest Court Just Refused Bruen — and Put the Under-21 Ban Back On
litigation

Delaware’s Highest Court Just Refused Bruen — and Put the Under-21 Ban Back On

On September 8 the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Superior Court in Birney, No. 412, 2025. Chief Justice Seitz kept means-end scrutiny for Article I, Section 20. H.B. 451 is back. Justice Traynor dissented.

WTF News September 15, 2026 📖 4 min read
⚡ Why This Matters to You
A state constitution that names self-defense as the purpose of the right just used interest-balancing to keep handguns away from legal adults. Other blue-state courts now have a template that says Bruen is optional if you plead the state clause instead.
  • Decided Sept. 8, 2026: Del. Dep’t of Safety v. Birney, No. 412, 2025. Majority: Seitz, C.J. Disposition: REVERSED.
  • H.B. 451’s 18-to-20 restrictions on most firearms are back under Delaware Constitution Article I, § 20. The court refused to adopt Bruen for that clause.
  • Plaintiffs: Gavin J. Birney, Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association, Bridgeville Rifle & Pistol Club. Birney later obtained a CCDW permit and aged out.
  • Justice Traynor dissented: the handgun ban plus a discretionary CCDW scheme overburdens self-defense.
  • No federal Second Amendment holding. Different case from Rigby (federal PMF/home-build).

The Delaware Supreme Court issued its opinion in Delaware Department of Safety and Homeland Security v. Birney on September 8, 2026. The caption is No. 412, 2025, on appeal from Superior Court C.A. No. K23C-07-019. Plaintiffs below were Gavin J. Birney, the Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association, and Bridgeville Rifle & Pistol Club. Defendants were the Department, Cabinet Secretary Nathaniel McQueen, Jr., and Col. Melissa Zebley. Chief Justice Seitz wrote for the majority. The judgment: REVERSED.

H.B. 451, signed in 2022, raised the age from eighteen to twenty-one to purchase, own, or possess most firearms and ammunition. It carved out shotguns and muzzleloaders, military and law enforcement, concealed-carry licensees, and supervised recreation. The Superior Court had held the law unconstitutional under Article I, Section 20 because it overburdened self-defense. The plaintiffs asked the Supreme Court to apply Bruen’s history-and-tradition test. Seitz declined. “We hew to our means-scrutiny precedent and decline to adopt the newly created history and tradition federal test.” The majority said Delaware’s Section 20 “is not a mirror image of the Second Amendment” and that Bruen does not control a state-constitution case the plaintiffs limited to Section 20.

The court then reversed the Superior Court’s burden analysis. It treated Delaware’s concealed-carry statute as a de facto shall-issue outlet — Bruen’s footnote had counted Delaware’s 2021 approval rate above 98% — and held a facial challenge fails if the statute can be applied constitutionally to anyone. Birney had obtained a concealed-carry permit in sixty-five days and aged out. Justice Traynor dissented. He agreed intermediate scrutiny applied, then said H.B. 451’s handgun ban on 18-to-20-year-olds still overburdened self-defense and that the concealed-carry carveout is discretionary by its own text. The federal Second Amendment challenge was not in this case. This is not last week’s Rigby ghost-gun ruling. It is Delaware’s high court putting the age ban back into force under state law.

"Delaware named self-defense in its constitution, then used the old balancing test to keep handguns from 18-year-olds."
DelawareBirneyunder 21H.B. 451BruenSection 20
← More Stories

Comments

Share your take. Name is public; state is optional. Be civil — spam is removed.

Loading comments…